What is the difference between Mediation and Collaborative Divorce?

People often wonder what the difference is between mediation and collaborative divorce.

The difference is that in mediation, although the parties usually have attorneys, those attorneys in a family mediation rarely come into the room. Instead, the parties discuss their situation with their attorneys outside the room and come in and work with a neutral facilitator, the mediator, in order to identify, discuss, and hopefully ultimately resolve the issues that they face.

In a collaborative divorce, there is no neutral facilitator. Instead, the attorneys hold that mediative role and together try to help the parties identify what’s important to them, identify the issues that they face, and work through the issues in order to resolve the situation that they are in and ultimately working towards a divorce.

In the collaborative model, it’s very common to work with non-lawyer professionals, mental health professionals who work as child specialists or divorce coaches to help with the communication and the dynamic issues that come up between the people when they’re angry and they fight and all that sort of stuff, and also with financial specialists who can help us focus on the finances of the people and help us identify options. It’s less common to work with the non-lawyer professionals in the mediation time, but it is also a possibility.

This is Katherine Miller. Thanks for watching YourTango’s Quickies. Connect with me at yourtango.com/experts/katherine_miller. I’d like to help you negotiate a good divorce. Visit me online at kem-law.com.